RAGSDALE v. RAGSDALE

RAGSDALE v. RAGSDALE
1929 OK 196
277 P. 583
136 Okla. 248
Case Number: 19309
Decided: 05/07/1929
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

RAGSDALE et al.
v.
RAGSDALE.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Reversal in Absence of Answer Brief.
The syllabus in the case of City National Bank v. Coatney et al., 122 Okla. 233, 253 P. 481, is hereby adopted as the syllabus in this case.

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Enloe V. Vernor, Judge.

Action by Lewis Ragsdale against Howard Ragsdale et al. Injunction granted. From this judgment, defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded, with directions.

J. Bernard Smith, for plaintiffs in error.
C. G. McKoin, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Muskogee county in an action wherein the plaintiffs in error were defendants below. Plaintiffs in error in due time served and filed their briefs in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or to otherwise appear in this cause upon the merits of the case, nor has he offered any excuse for his failure to do so. In the case of City National Bank v. Coatney et al., 122 Okla. 233, 253 P. 481, this court said: