GOODMAN v. SKLAR

Annotate this Case

GOODMAN v. SKLAR
1928 OK 372
268 P. 201
131 Okla. 162
Case Number: 18222
Decided: 06/05/1928
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

GOODMAN
v.
SKLAR.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Reversal in Absence of Answer Brief.
The syllabus in the case of City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233, 253 P. 481, is hereby adopted as the syllabus in this case.

Error from District Court, Osage County; Jesse J. Worten, Judge.

Action by Samuel B. Sklar against Goldie Sklar Goodman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Preston A. Shinn, for plaintiff in error.
John L. Arrington, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Osage county, wherein the defendant in error was plaintiff.

¶2 Plaintiff in error in due time served and filed her brief in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or otherwise appear in this court upon the merits of the case, nor has he offered any excuse for his failure to do so.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.