EGGLESTON v. SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO.

Annotate this Case

EGGLESTON v. SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO.
1928 OK 355
269 P. 357
132 Okla. 84
Case Number: 18378
Decided: 05/29/1928
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

EGGLESTON
v.
SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO. et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Oil and Gas--Instrument Construed as Lease Forfeited by Abandonment.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed upon the authority of case No. 18375, Thomas L. Eggleston, Sr., v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company et al., this day decided (132 Okla. 81, 269 P. 306).

Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge.

Action by Thomas L. Eggleston, Sr., against the Sinclair Oil & Gas Company et al. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.

Snyder, Owen & Lybrand, for plaintiff in error.
Edw. H. Chandler, Wm. O. Beall, Thos. J. Hanlon, Summers Hardy, Robert L. Imler, and W. W. Sutton, for defendants in error.

LESTER, J.

¶1 The identical question here presented was involved in No. 18375, Thomas L. Eggleston, Sr., v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. et al., this day decided by this court (132 Okla. 81, 269 P. 306), and by stipulation of the parties, this cage was submitted on the same briefs and oral argument.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.