McQUEEN GIN CO. v. CRENSHAW

Annotate this Case

McQUEEN GIN CO. v. CRENSHAW
1926 OK 801
254 P. 496
123 Okla. 186
Case Number: 17238
Decided: 10/05/1926
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

McQUEEN GIN CO.
v.
CRENSHAW et al.

Syllabus

ΒΆ0 1. Appeal and Error--Sufficiency of Evidence in Law Action.
A judgment of a court based upon the verdict of a jury in the trial of a law action will not be reversed on appeal, if there is any competent evidence, which reasonably tends to support the verdict of the jury.
2. Same--Recovery for Drilling Water Well Sustained.
Record examined; held to be sufficient to support judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 4.

Error from District Court, Harmon County; Frank Mathews, Judge.

Action by H. N. Crenshaw et al. for debt against the McQueen Gin Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

W. C. Austin, for plaintiff in error.
R. D. Miller, for defendants in error.

STEPHENSON, C.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.