FREED v. BANK OF AURORA

Annotate this Case

FREED v. BANK OF AURORA
1925 OK 843
240 P. 618
113 Okla. 186
Case Number: 16669
Decided: 10/20/1925
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

FREED
v.
BANK OF AURORA.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Case-Made--Extension of Time--Invalidity of Order.
Where the trial judge makes an order extending the time to serve case-made after the expiration of the time before granted for such extension, the same is void.

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; A. C. Brewster, Judge.

Action between the Bank of Aurora and Abe Freed, sole trader, doing business in the name of Freed Furniture Company. From the judgment, the latter appeals. Dismissed.

Rogers & Jones, for plaintiff in error.
C. A. Steele and W. A. Daugherty, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This case is appealed from the district court of Tulsa county, and defendant in error moves to dismiss on the ground that case-made was not served within the time provided by statute, nor within any valid extension of time. Judgment was rendered on the 7th day of February, 1925, and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was allowed 30 days from date in which to serve case-made, which expired on the 9th day of March, 1925. On the 10th day of March, 1925, the time was extended 20 days, and after other extensions, case-made was finally served on the 6th day of August, 1925.

¶2 The order of March 10th is void and case-made is nullity, and this court without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Hoggard v. Conservative Loan Company, 101 Okla. 14, 222 P. 674.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.