CUMMINGS v. PRICE

Annotate this Case

CUMMINGS v. PRICE
1923 OK 73
212 P. 602
88 Okla. 206
Case Number: 12682
Decided: 02/06/1923
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

CUMMINGS
v.
PRICE, Adm'r.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error -- Failure to File Brief--Dismissal.
Where plaintiff in error fails to file his appeal in this court within six months from the date of the rendition of the judgment or order appealed from, as required by section 798, Comp. Okla. Stat. 1921, this court is without jurisdiction of such appeal and the same will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; John L. Coffman, Judge.

Action by A. M. Cummings against D. E. Price, administrator of the estate of J. P. Price, deceased. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Dismissed.

Busby & Harrell, for plaintiff in error.
Thomas P. Holt, for defendant in error.

NICHOLSON, J.

¶1 This case is before us on the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the appeal was not lodged in this court within six months from the date of the judgment.

¶2 It appears from the record that the verdict was returned and judgment rendered thereon on March 1, 1921; motion for new trial was filed on March 3, 1921, and overruled on March 5, 1921. The journal entry of judgment was not filed until April 4, 1921. The petition in error with case-made attached was not filed in this court until October 3, 1921.

¶3 The plaintiff in error contends that the judgment was not rendered until the journal entry thereof was filed, viz., on April 4, 1921, but the journal entry shows on its face that the judgment was rendered on March 1, 1921, and the motion for new trial filed by the plaintiff moves the court to vacate and set aside the judgment rendered on the 1st day of March, 1921.

¶4 The appeal not having been filed in this court within the time required by section 798, Comp. Okla. Stat. 1921, this court is without jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.