SWANSON v. COLEMAN

Annotate this Case

SWANSON v. COLEMAN
1922 OK 312
209 P. 1119
87 Okla. 229
Case Number: 11170
Decided: 10/10/1922
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

SWANSON et al.
v.
COLEMAN et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Action to quiet title to certain land brought by Prince Coleman et al. against G. M. Swanson and C. B. Walker. Judgment for plaintiff, Prince Coleman, and defendants appeal. Cause reversed and remanded, with directions upon stipulation of parties.

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Lucien B. Wright, Judge.

Chas. F. Runyan, George T. Brown, F. F. Betzer, and Bell & Fellows, for plaintiffs in error.
Lawrence & Lawrence, G. R. Horner, and J. I. Pitchford, for defendants in error.

 

McNEILL, J.

¶1 This action was commenced in the district court of Okmulgee county by Prince Coleman and Odessa Coleman, and Prince Coleman by his guardian, J. M. Brogan, against G. M. Swanson and C. B. Walker to recover possession of and quiet title to the northeast quarter of section 27, township 16, range 12, and the southeast quarter section 10, township 13 north, range 11 E. I. M., situated in Okmulgee county.

¶2 From a judgment in favor of plaintiff Coleman and his guardian and against defendants, the defendants Swanson and Walker have appealed. Since filing the appeal in this court. Prince Coleman has been restored to capacity and by stipulation of attorneys of all parties this court by previous order continued the prosecution of the case in the name of Prince Coleman in his own right. The defendants in error have filed a confession of error and stipulation to reverse the judgment. By the terms of the stipulation it is agreed that the case has been compromised and a new deed executed by Coleman to the plaintiffs in error, and the parties stipulated that judgment may be rendered in this court quieting title in Swanson and Walker against Coleman.

¶3 It is also stipulated that Odessa Coleman was not a proper party in the suit below, that no judgment was rendered in the lower court in her favor, and that she is not a proper party to this suit.

¶4 Upon the stipulation the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to permit the plaintiffs in error to file a supplemental answer in the trial court setting out their new deed, and upon filing said answer judgment should be rendered in the lower court quieting title to Swanson and Walker, and it is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.