STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF CREEK COUNTY v. FOSTER et al.

Annotate this Case

STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF CREEK COUNTY v. FOSTER et al.
1919 OK 312
184 P. 910
76 Okla. 227
Case Number: 10645
Decided: 10/28/1919
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF CREEK COUNTY
v.
FOSTER et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Briefs--Necessity of Filing.
Where a cause has been regularly assigned for submission and plaintiff in error fails to file brief or to offer any excuse for not doing so, it will be presumed the appeal has been abandoned and the same will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Creek County; M. L. Bozarth, Judge.

Mandamus by the State on the relation of the Board of County Commissioners of Creek County against P. O. Foster, Clerk, and others. Judgment for defendants, and relator brings error. Dismissed.

Earl Foster, County Attorney of Creek County, for plaintiffs in error.
Ernest B. Hughes, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This cause was advanced on motion of the county attorney and assigned for submission. Plaintiff in error has failed to file brief, as required by rule 7 of this court, or to offer any excuse, for not doing so.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.