In re ASSESSMENT OF OKLAHOMA STOCKYARDS NAT. BANK

Annotate this Case

In re ASSESSMENT OF OKLAHOMA STOCKYARDS NAT. BANK
1919 OK 28
178 P. 485
72 Okla. 36
Case Number: 8330
Decided: 01/28/1919
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In re ASSESSMENT OF OKLAHOMA STOCKYARDS NAT. BANK.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Loss of Petition in Error--Substituted Petition--Dismissal.
Where the petition in error has become lost or mislaid, and the court makes an order directing that the plaintiff in error substitute said petition in error within 20 days, and the plaintiff in error fails to comply wth said order, and offers no reason for not complying with the same, said cause will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge.

Appeal from a judgment rendered upon an appeal from an order of the County Board of Equalization relative to an assessment of taxes against the Oklahoma Stockyards National Bank. Appeal dismissed.

Chas. B. Selby, Co. Atty., for Board of Com'rs and Board of Equalization.
John Choate and Crawford D. Bennett, for the Bank.

McNEILL, J.

¶1 This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county, rendered upon appeal from an order of the county board of equalization, relative to an assessment of taxes against the Oklahoma Stockyards National Bank. It was sought to have this judgment reviewed by petition in error and case made. The originals have been lost or misplaced and cannot now be found. The case-made was substituted. On the 23d of April, 1918, this court made an order directing that the plaintiff in error substitute a copy of the petition in error within 20 days. Plaintiff in error has failed to comply with said order, and no reason has been given for not complying with the same. The plaintiff in error having failed to comply with said order within 20 days. and having given no reason for not complying with the same, the cause will therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶2 The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.