STATE ex rel. UNION STATE BANK OF SHAWNEE v. LINN

Annotate this Case

STATE ex rel. UNION STATE BANK OF SHAWNEE v. LINN
1918 OK 637
176 P. 224
71 Okla. 177
Case Number: 9635
Decided: 11/19/1918
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

STATE ex rel. UNION STATE BANK OF SHAWNEE et al.
v.
LINN, District Judge.

Syllabus

¶0 Courts--Original Action in Supreme Court--Failure to File Briefs--Dismissal.
Where the relators in an original action in this court fail to file briefs in compliance with the rules governing same, the cause will be dismissed.

Original mandamus by State of Oklahoma, on relation of the Union State Bank of Shawnee and others, against Conn Linn. Judge of the District Court of Tulsa County, Okla. Dismissed.

Aby & Tucker and Abernathy & Howell, for relators.
W. N. Redwine and Horace Speed, for respondent.

SHARP, C. J.

¶1 On December 11, 1917, relators filed in this court their original petition asking that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue requiring Hon. Conn Linn. judge of the district court of the Twenty-First judicial district, to certify his disqualification to sit as a trial judge in the case of C. C. Mueller and others, plaintiffs, against the Arkansas River Bed Oil & Gas Company and others, defendants, then pending in the district court of Tulsa county. On the 15th day of December following, motion to strike the petition was filed. The case was regularly assigned for submission on April 9, 1918, on which day the relators filed their motion to dismiss the case at their costs. On the same day and on call of the docket, the case was submitted. On April 11th thereafter relators were granted leave to withdraw their motion to dismiss. No briefs have ever been filed, though the cause has been submitted more than seven months.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.