MASON v. FORD

Annotate this Case

MASON v. FORD
1918 OK 489
174 P. 770
71 Okla. 8
Case Number: 9749
Decided: 08/27/1918
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

MASON
v.
FORD et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error -- Dismissal -- Moot Question.
Appeal dismissed for the reason that the question presented for review has become moot and hypothetical.

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Chas. G. Watts, Judge.

In the matter of Stella Mason nee Manuel. P. M. Ford was appointed guardian on the application of Isaac Mason, and Stella Mason brings error. Appeal dismissed.

S. M. Rutherford and James W. Cosgrove, for plaintiff in error.
Zevely, Givens & Stoutz, S. V. O'Hare, and Brown & Stewart, for defendants in error.

KANE, J.

¶1 This cause comes on to be heard upon the suggestion of the death of the appellant and motion to dismiss appeal filed by her attorneys of record. The motion is accompanied by a showing to the effect that the appeal was taken from an order of the trial court appointing a guardian of the person and estate of the appellant; that after the said appeal was prosecuted to this court the appellant died, and thereafter her former guardian was appointed as her executor; that up to the time of the death of the appellant her estate was in the hands of P. M. Ford as guardian, and that it is now in the hands of P. M. Ford as executor.

¶2 In these circumstances the question presented for review has become moot and hypothetical, and the motion to dismiss must therefore be sustained.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.