LITTLEFIELD v. GARNER

Annotate this Case

LITTLEFIELD v. GARNER
1918 OK 242
172 P. 438
68 Okla. 149
Case Number: 9784
Decided: 04/23/1918
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

LITTLEFIELD
v.
GARNER et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Time for Taking Appeal --Dismissal.
Where plaintiff in error fails to file his appeal in this court within six months from the date of the rendition of the judgment or order appealed from, as required by chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11, the same will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Error from District Court, Caddo County; Will Linn, Judge.

Action by J. E. Littlefield against John D. Garner and others. From a final order sustaining defendant Garner's demurrer to a second amended petition, plaintiff brings error. Dismissed.

L. E. McKnight, for plaintiff in error.
Geo. T. Webster and Dyke Ballinger, for defendants in error.

RAINEY, J.

¶1 The final order appealed from in this case is that of the district court of Caddo county, Okla., in sustaining the demurrer of the defendant in error John D. Garner in the second amended petition filed by the plaintiff in error, J. E. Littlefield, which order of the court was made on the 3d day of September, 1917. On that day the plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal, and on March 6, 1918, the petition in error and case-made were filed in this court. The defendant in error John D. Garner has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction of the case, for the reason that the said petition in error and case-made were not filed in this court within six months from the date of the order appealed from. No response has been filed to this motion, doubtless for the reason that under the numerous decisions of this court the same would have been unavailing. Thomason et al. v. Champlin, 43 Okla. 86, 141 P. 411; Gaskin v. Simmons-Burk Clothing Co., 38 Okla. 228. 132 P. 821.

¶2 For the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.