HALLAM et al. v. CLAGGETT.

Annotate this Case

HALLAM et al. v. CLAGGETT.
1917 OK 407
166 P. 880
66 Okla. 53
Case Number: 6752
Decided: 07/31/1917
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HALLAM et al.
v.
CLAGGETT.

Syllabus

¶0 Affirmance of Judgment--Propriety. The same as in No. 6754, Alfred Hallam et al. v. Rose E. Bailey, 66 Okla. 46, 166 P. 874.

Sears & Snyder and Glass & Weaver, for plaintiffs in error.
J. C. Denton, for defendant in error.

STEWART, C.

 
¶1 This is one of five companion cases, such cases being No. 6751, Alfred Hallam et al. v. Willie Claggett, 66 Okla. 52, 167 P. 215; No. 6752, Alfred Hallam et al. v. Ruth Claggett, 66 Okla. 53, 166 P. 880; No. 6755, Alfred Hallam et al. v. Jane Claggett, 66 Okla. 52, 166 P. 879. This case was determined in the lower court, on the same testimony, as far as applicable, introduced in the case of Alfred Hallam et al. v. Rose E. Bailey, supra, in which case this court has just rendered an opinion, affirming the judgment of the trial court. The facts are substantially the same as in the Rose E. Bailey Case, and for the reasons therein assigned the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.