MISSOURI K. & T. R. CO. v. BLUE.

Annotate this Case

MISSOURI K. & T. R. CO. v. BLUE.
1916 OK 878
160 P. 594
61 Okla. 125
Case Number: 7113
Decided: 10/17/1916
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

MISSOURI, K. & T. R. CO.
v.
BLUE.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Briefs--Effect of Failure to File--Reversal.
Where a plaintiff has prepared, served and filed a brief, and there is no brief filed and no reason given or excuse offered for its absence on the part of the defendant in error, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory on which the judgment below may be sustained, but when the brief appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error the court may reverse the judgment in accordance with the prayer of the petition.

Error from County Court, Osage County; Paul B. Mason, Judge.

Action by G. W. Blue against the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Clifford L. Jackson, W. R. Allen, and M. D. Green, for plaintiff in error.

BRUNSON, C.

¶1 The defendant in error has failed to file a brief in this court in support of his judgment in compliance with the rules and orders of this court. The brief of the plaintiff in error appears to sustain its contention, and where the plaintiff in error has prepared, served, and filed its brief as provided by the rules of this court, and there is no brief filed by the defendant in error nor reason given nor excuse offered for not doing so, and the same is long overdue, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory on which the judgment below may be sustained; but when the brief filed by the plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain and support the assignments of error, this court may reverse the judgment in compliance with the prayer of the petition. C., R. I. & P. R. Co. et al. v. Sewell, 60 Okla. 30, 158 P. 1142; Bryan et al., State Board of Agriculture, v. State ex rel. Holt, County Attorney, et al., 44 Okla. 653, 146 P. 32.

¶2 The judgment should therefore be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.