DAUGHERTY v. FELAND

Annotate this Case

DAUGHERTY v. FELAND
1916 OK 666
157 P. 1146
59 Okla. 124
Case Number: 7463
Decided: 06/13/1916
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

DAUGHERTY et al.
v.
FELAND.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error -- Supersedeas Bond--Entry of Judgment.
In a case where execution of a judgment, affirmed in the Supreme Court on appeal, has been stayed by virtue of a supersedeas bond, under the provisions of chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, judgment will be entered in this court against the sureties on such bond.

Error from District Court, Rogers County. T. L. Brown, Judge.

Motion for judgment against the sureties on a supersedeas bond. Motion sustained.

E. G. Wilson, for plaintiffs in error.
Adams & Wills, for defendant in error.

BLEAKMORE, C.

¶1 On appeal to this court from a judgment of the district court of Rogers county, a supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error as principals, and T. A. Eakin, J. A. Carnett, G. B. Merryman, and H. J. Witon as sureties, to stay such judgment. On May 16, 1916, the judgment was affirmed, and motion has been filed in this court for judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond, which motion is sustained under authority of chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342, 152 P. 1078.

¶2 Judgment is therefore entered in this court against T. A. Eakin, J. A. Carnett, G. B. Merryman, and H. J. Witon in the sum of $ 512.38, with interest at 8 per cent per annum from December 31, 1914, and costs, for which let execution issue out of the trial court.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.