KING v. POOL

Annotate this Case

KING v. POOL
1915 OK 1103
153 P. 860
49 Okla. 573
Case Number: 7665
Decided: 12/21/1915
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

KING
v.
POOL.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Case-Made. Where plaintiff in error fails to make and serve his case-made within the time allowed by statute, or within the time as extended by the court before the expiration of the statutory period, the same is a nullity, and, on motion, the appeal will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County. Geo. C. Crump, Judge.

Action between Annie King and J. W. Pool. From the judgment, Annie King brings error. Dismissed.

Lafayette Walker, for plaintiff in error
Rossiter & Wright, for defendant in error

PER CURIAM.

¶1 The order overruling the motion for a new trial in this cause was made and entered on March 29, 1915. The record before us fails to disclose that an extension of the time for serving case-made was made by the trial court until May 26, 1915. As the case-made was not served within the time allowed by statute (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5242), nor did the trial court attempt to extend the time for such service before the expiration of the statutory period, nor is the record certified as a transcript, it follows that the motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

¶2 It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.