THOMAS v. HENDERSON

Annotate this Case

THOMAS v. HENDERSON
1915 OK 207
148 P. 839
46 Okla. 690
Case Number: 4405
Decided: 04/27/1915
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

THOMAS
v.
HENDERSON.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Affirmance--Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix), the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Error from County Court, Woodward County; Clyde H. Wyand, Judge.

Action by L. R. Henderson against Daniel Thomas. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Charles Swindall, for plaintiff in error.

BLEAKMORE, C.

¶1 The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on September 28, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

¶2 The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.