MILLIKEN v. NICHOLS.

Annotate this Case

MILLIKEN v. NICHOLS.
1914 OK 390
142 P. 1040
43 Okla. 260
Case Number: 5906
Decided: 08/25/1914
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

MILLIKEN
v.
NICHOLS.

Syllabus by the Court.

¶0 Dismissed because proceeding in error was not filed in the Supreme Court within the time required by law.

Dillard & Blake, of Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
J. E. Lydecker, of Tulsa, and R. H. Nichols, of Woodward, for defendant in error.

KANE, C. J.

¶1 This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion to dismiss the appeal, filed by the defendant in error, upon the ground, among others, that:

"The so-called case-made was not filed in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court, nor was summons in error issued thereon within six months next after the date of the judgment complained of, as will fully appear by reference to the record, the date of the filing thereof, and of the issuance of summons thereon."

¶2 This is sufficient ground for dismissal. The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be sustained.

¶3 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.