BRYAN v. UMHOLTS

Annotate this Case

BRYAN v. UMHOLTS
1914 OK 328
141 P. 1107
42 Okla. 477
Case Number: 3222
Decided: 07/14/1914
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BRYAN
v.
UMHOLTS.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR-- Presentation for Review--Briefs--Dismissal. Where an appeal is duly perfected, and the cause is assigned and regularly submitted, and then plaintiff in error fails to serve and file briefs as required by rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix) of this court, or to offer any excuse for not doing so such appeal will be presumed to have been abandoned, and will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge.

Action between Milton Bryan and F. M. Umholts. From an order overruling objections to the confirmation of a sale of real estate, and confirming the sale, Milton Bryan brings error. Dismissed.

J. V. Cabell, for plaintiff in error
Everest, Smith & Campbell, for defendant in error

GALBRAITH, C.

¶1 This is an appeal upon transcript from an order overruling objections to the confirmation of a sale of real estate, sold upon an order of sale issued in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding, and the order confirming such sale. The transcript was filed with the clerk of this court on October 28, 1911, and the cause was thereafter set for submission and regularly submitted. The plaintiff in error has failed to file and serve briefs as required by rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix) of this court, or to offer any excuse for not doing so.

¶2 The appeal will be taken as abandoned, and should be dismissed for want of prosecution, and the costs taxed against the plaintiff in error.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.