WRIGHT v. STATE

WRIGHT v. STATE
1914 OK 247
140 P. 1147
42 Okla. 251
Case Number: 3711
Decided: 05/12/1914
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

WRIGHT et al.
v.
STATE.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Want of Briefs--Affirmance. On account of the failure of the plaintiffs in error to serve and file briefs, as prescribed by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix), the judgment rendered against them in the trial court should be affirmed.

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; Geo. C. Abernathy, Judge.

Action by the State against Thomas H. Wright and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.

S. P. Freeling, for plaintiffs in error
C. P. Holt, Co. Atty., for the State

GALBRAITH, C.

¶1 This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the state of Oklahoma in the sum of $ 1,500, and against the plaintiffs in error, as principal and sureties on a forfeited bail bond. The petition in error with case-made was filed in this court March 20, 1912, and the cause was regularly set down for submission and submitted on the 16th day of April, 1914. The plaintiffs in error have not served or filed briefs as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix).

¶2 On account of such default and failure, as prescribed in said rule, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.