SEXSMITH v. CHAPPELL.

Annotate this Case

SEXSMITH v. CHAPPELL.
1913 OK 82
130 P. 282
35 Okla. 503
Case Number: 4734
Decided: 02/04/1913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

SEXSMITH
v.
CHAPPELL.

Syllabus

¶0 1. CLERKS OF COURTS--County Officers. The office of clerk of the superior court is a county office.
2. SAME-- Terms--Repeal of Statute. Section 8 of the act of March 6, 1909 (Sess. Laws 1909, c. 14, art. 7; chapter 24, art. 4, sec. 1972, Comp. Laws 1909), in so far as it affects the term of the clerk of the superior court, is repealed by section 19 of the act of March 19, 1910 (chapter 69, Sess. Laws 1910, pp. 129, 137).
3. SAME--Election. The laws in force in this state at the time of the holding of the election for county officers in November, 1912, provide for the election of the clerk of the superior court.

Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge.

Action by M. T. Sexsmith against H. E. Chappell. From the judgment, Sexsmith brings error. Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

Parker & Simons, for plaintiff in error.
McKeever & Walker and Robberts, Curran & Otjen, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, J.

¶1 This proceeding in error seeks to have reviewed the judgment of the trial court adjudicating the title to the office of clerk of the superior court of Garfield county.

¶2 The same question involved in this case has this day been determined by this court in Beaty v. State ex rel. Lee, post, 130 P. 956, in favor of the contention of defendant in error.

¶3 The case is reversed and remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial, and to award the possession of the office of clerk of the superior court of Garfield county to the plaintiff in error.

¶4 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.