SHIVES v. FROHBERG

Annotate this Case

SHIVES v. FROHBERG
1913 OK 617
136 P. 399
40 Okla. 85
Case Number: 2976
Decided: 11/04/1913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

SHIVES
v.
FROHBERG.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Motion for New Trial-- Necessity. Syllabus same as State v. Poor, 33 Okla. 376, 125 P. 726.

Crump & Skinner and Blakeney & Maxey, for plaintiff in error.
J. H. Woods, S. A. Sheldon, and J. H. Miley, for defendant in error.

 
PER CURIAM.

¶1 This proceeding in error is brought to reverse a judgment rendered upon a demurrer to the evidence, and the errors complained of consist only of errors alleged to have occurred on the trial. The record fails to disclose that a motion for a new trial was filed in the trial court, which motion is necessary in order to review the errors complained of. State v. Poor, 33 Okla. 376, 125 P. 726; Stump v. Porter et al., 31 Okla. 157, 120 P. 639; State v. Adams, 31 Okla. 775, 123 P. 1127; Campbell v. Lane, 31 Okla. 757, 123 P. 1061. The motion to dismiss is sustained.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.