M. GOBLE & CO. v. MILLS

Annotate this Case

M. GOBLE & CO. v. MILLS
1913 OK 23
129 P. 706
36 Okla. 516
Case Number: 2465
Decided: 01/07/1913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

M. GOBLE & CO.
v.
MILLS.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Failure to File Briefs. A cause having been duly assigned for hearing, and being reached on the calendar in due course, no briefs having been filed as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the same will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Charles Bagg, Judge.

Action by Belle Mills, by her next friend, Eliza Mills, against M. Goble & Co., a partnership composed of Charles Goble and Merritt Goble. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $ 3,000, defendant brings error. Dismissed.

Davis & White, for plaintiff in error.
Robertson & Kean and W. W. Momyer, for defendant in error.

SHARP, C.

¶1 The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on March 27, 1911. The case was duly assigned for hearing at the December, 1912, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi). It follows that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.