STATE ex rel. EATON v. HEATH

Annotate this Case

STATE ex rel. EATON v. HEATH
1913 OK 225
131 P. 685
37 Okla. 187
Case Number: 2549
Decided: 04/04/1913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

STATE ex rel. EATON, County Atty.,
v.
HEATH.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Abandonment of Appeal--Briefs. Where, in an action by the state, on the relation of the county attorney, against a person for using and permitting his premises to be used for the purpose of unlawfully keeping and dispensing intoxicating liquors, no briefs are filed by either party, the appeal will be deemed abandoned, and the cause will be dismissed.

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge.

Proceeding by the State, on the relation of Joe S. Eaton, County Attorney of Okmulgee County, against Robert Heath. A demurrer to relator's petition was sustained, and he brings error. Dismissed.

HARRISON, C.

¶1 This action was begun by Joe S. Eaton, county attorney of Okmulgee county, in May, 1910, against Robert Heath, for using and permitting to be used, certain premises in the town of Morris, in Okmulgee county, for the purpose of keeping and dispensing intoxicating liquors in violation of law. Defendant demurred to the petition, on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. The county attorney refused to plead further and appealed to this court.

¶2 The petition in error and case-made was filed here May 26, 1911. The cause was assigned for submission December 6, 1912. No briefs having been filed, the appeal is deemed to have been abandoned, and the cause should be dismissed for failure to file briefs, as required by the rules of this court.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.