HUDDLESTUN v. D. M. OSBORNE & CO.

Annotate this Case

HUDDLESTUN v. D. M. OSBORNE & CO.
1913 OK 101
130 P. 146
37 Okla. 18
Case Number: 2457
Decided: 02/11/1913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HUDDLESTUN
v.
D. M. OSBORNE & CO.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiff in error fails to comply with the rules of this court, requiring him to serve a brief on counsel for defendant in error and at the same time to file fifteen copies of his brief with the clerk of the court, his case, on being reached for submission, will be dismissed.

Error from Washita County Court; L. R. Shean, Judge.

Action by D. M. Osborne & Co. against Fred M. Huddlestun. Judgment for plaintiff in the justice court was affirmed on appeal, and defendant again brings error. Dismissed.

M. L. Holcomb, for plaintiff in error.
Snodgrass & Darnell, for defendant in error.

SHARP, C.

¶1 The petition in error was filed in this court March 23, 1911. Thereafter a motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by defendant in error, which motion was by the court overruled on June 18, 1912, of which action of the court counsel for plaintiff in error was informed. The case was regularly assigned for submission at the December, 1912, term of the court, but plaintiff in error has filed no brief; neither has he asked for an extension of time in which to file brief.

¶2 Upon the authority of Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co., 29 Okla. 9, 115 P. 1016, and other cases cited in the opinion of the court, the appeal should be dismissed.

¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.