ABBOTT v. RODGERS.

Annotate this Case

ABBOTT v. RODGERS.
1912 OK 787
128 P. 908
35 Okla. 189
Case Number: 4064
Decided: 12/03/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

ABBOTT
v.
RODGERS.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Case-Made--Filing Below. The case-made attached to the petition in error, or a copy thereof, not having been filed with the papers in the case in the court below, the same is a nullity, and cannot be considered in this court, for the purpose of reviewing matters complained of in the trial court.

Baker & Bloss, for plaintiff in error.
Robt. E. Adams, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, J.

¶1 Counsel for defendant in error moves to dismiss this proceeding in error for the reason that neither the case-made attached to the petition in error nor a copy thereof was filed with the papers in the case below. The said motion was filed in this court on November 13, 1912, showing service on attorneys for the plaintiff in error on the 11th day of November, 1912. No response has been made to said motion. Under the authority of St. Louis, I. M. & So. Ry. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701, 127 P. 478, the motion must be sustained. See, also, Marple v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank, 28 Okla. 810, 115 P. 1124; Oligschlager v. Grell, 13 Okla. 632, 75 P. 1131. The motion to dismiss this proceeding in error must therefore be sustained.

¶2 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.