ELLISON v. BANK OF MEEKERAnnotate this Case
ELLISON v. BANK OF MEEKER
1911 OK 20
117 P. 199
27 Okla. 782
Case Number: 666
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
ELLISON et al.
BANK OF MEEKER.
¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Review--Verdict--Sufficiency of Evidence. Syllabus same as paragraph 3 of the syllabus in Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. Chandler Cotton Oil Co., 25 Okla. 82, 106 P. 10.
Error from District Court, Lincoln County; W. N. Maben, Judge.
Action by the Bank of Meeker against V. S. Ellison and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.
Roy Hoffman and J. B. A. Robertson, for plaintiffs in error.
Edgar N. Sweet, S.D. Decker, and V. S. Decker, for defendant in error.
¶1 The note sued upon by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, was non-negotiable. All defenses that were permissible between the original parties are still available. The issues of fact were submitted under proper instructions, and the verdict of the jury, as approved by the trial court in overruling the motion for new trial, there being substantial evidence to support the same, is conclusive on this court. Ft. Smith & Western R. Co. v. Chandler Cotton Oil Co., 25 Okla. 82, 106 P. 10.
¶2 The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
¶3 All the Justices, concur, except HAYES, J., absent and not participating.