ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. v. WHALE et al.

Annotate this Case

ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. v. WHALE et al.
1910 OK 93
108 P. 403
25 Okla. 852
Case Number: 463
Decided: 03/08/1910
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO.
v.
WHALE et al.

Error from District Court, Bryan County; D. A. Richardson, Judge.

Action by S. A. Whale and the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company of Hartford against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

R. A. Kleinschmidt and Dech & Dech, for plaintiff in error.
Hatchett & Ferguson, for defendants in error.

DUNN, C. J.

¶1 Counsel for both parties in the above-entitled cause have agreed that the judgment rendered therein is supported by the same evidence as that in the case of St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company v. Shannon (reported in this volume) 108 P. 401; the only difference in the two cases being that in the instant case the cause of action is for hay which was destroyed at the time the barn was burned for which the action above referred to was brought, and it is stipulated that the decision in this case shall follow the decision in the Shannon Case.

¶2 It follows, therefore, that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

¶3 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.