BLUMLE v. KRAMER

Annotate this Case

BLUMLE v. KRAMER
1904 OK 67
79 P. 1134
14 Okla. 373
Decided: 09/02/1904
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

SEBASTIAN BLUMLE
v.
BALTHAZ KRAMER.

¶0 Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County; before Benj. F. Burwell, Trial Judge.

M. Fulton and G. A. Paul, for plaintiff in error.
H. H. Howard, for defendant in error.

PANCOAST J.:

¶1 The facts which are material in this case are exactly the same as those of case No. 1462, Sebastian Blumle and Caroline Blumle, v. Balthaz Kramer, and upon the authority of that case and the principles enunciated therein, this case is affirmed.

 

¶2 Burwell, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.