In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Maddox

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Maddox, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-1352.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-1352 IN RE CASES HELD FOR THE DECISION IN STATE v. MADDOX. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Maddox, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-1352.] Disposition of cases held for the decision in State v. Maddox. (Submitted April 13, 2022 Decided April 27, 2022.) __________________ {¶ 1} The judgments of the courts of appeals in the following cases are reversed, and the causes are remanded for further proceedings consistent with this court’s decision in State v. Maddox, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-764, ___ N.E.3d ___: 2020-1232. State v. Downard, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2019-0079, 2020-Ohio-4227. 2020-1243. State v. Velliquette, 2020-Ohio-4855, 160 N.E.3d 414 (6th Dist.). SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2021-0001. State v. Cochran, 5th Dist. Licking No. 2019 CA 00122, 2020Ohio-5329. 2021-0374. State v. Beatty, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2020-0015, 2021Ohio-355. 2021-0383. State v. Ludwig, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2020-0008, 2021-Ohio-383. 2021-0422. State v. Bothuel, 6th Dist. Lucas No. L-20-1053, 2021-Ohio875. 2021-0458. State v. Doughty, 5th Dist. Perry No. 20-CA-00001, 2021Ohio-651. 2021-0629. State v. Stevens, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2020-0010, 2021-Ohio-1156. 2021-0662. State v. Mills, 5th Dist. Coshocton No. 2020 CA 10, 2021Ohio-1180. 2021-0726. State v. Hunter, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2020-0042, 2021Ohio-1424. 2021-0779. State v. Slye, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2020-0051, 2021Ohio-1581. 2021-0902 and 2021-0925. State v. Moran, 11th Dist. Lake Nos. 2020-L114 through 2020-L-117, 2021-Ohio-1987. 2021-0919. State v. Stenson, 6th Dist. Lucas No. L-20-1074, 2021-Ohio2256. 2021-1155. State v. McGowan, 6th Dist. Sandusky No. S-20-020, 2021Ohio-404. 2021-1175. State v. Long, 4th Dist. Pickaway No. 20CA9, 2021-Ohio2672. 2 January Term, 2022 2021-1327 and 2021-1348. State v. Woods, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2021-L044, 2021-Ohio-3173. 2021-1395. State v. Joyce, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2021-L-006, 2021-Ohio3476. 2021-1398. State v. Waggle, 2021-Ohio-3457, 178 N.E.3d 562 (5th Dist.). 2021-1415. State v. Williams, 2021-Ohio-3579, 179 N.E.3d 228 (5th Dist.). 2021-1540. State v. Waltz, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2021-0012, 2021Ohio-3895. 2021-1590. State v. Brazo, 5th Dist. Licking No. 2021 CA 0016, 2021Ohio-4006. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. __________________ {¶ 2} The causes in the following cases are dismissed as having been improvidently accepted: 2021-0059. State v. Wolfe, 5th Dist. Licking No. 2020CA00021, 2020Ohio-5501. 2021-0063. State v. Dames, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109090, 2020-Ohio4991. 2021-0067. State v. Ferguson, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2020-L-031, 2020Ohio-5578. 2021-0086. State v. Stone, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109322, 2020-Ohio5263. 2021-0173. State v. Jones, 11th Dist. Lake Nos. 2020-L-056, 2020-L-057, 2020-L-059, and 2020-L-060, 2020-Ohio-7002. 2021-0585. State v. Crawford, 3d Dist. Henry No. 7-20-05, 2021-Ohio547. 3 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2021-0589. State v. Noble, 11th Dist. Lake Nos. 2020-L-079 and 2020-L080, 2021-Ohio-1062. 2021-0707. State v. Hodgkin, 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2020-08-048, 2021-Ohio-1353. 2021-1005. State v. Singh, 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2020-09-056, 2021Ohio-2158. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________ {¶ 3} The cause in the following case is also dismissed as having been improvidently accepted: 2021-1125. State v. Tupuola, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2020-0056, 2021-Ohio-2577. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, and DONNELLY, JJ., concur. STEWART and BRUNNER, JJ., dissent and would order briefing on proposition of law Nos. IV and V. _________________ {¶ 4} Sua sponte, the causes in the following cases are held for the decisions in 2020-1496, State v. Hacker, and 2021-0532, State v. Simmons: 2021-0591. State v. Sinkhorn, 2d Dist. Clark No. 2019-CA-79, 2020-Ohio5359. 2021-0996. State v. Rodriguez, 3d Dist. Seneca No. 13-20-07, 2021-Ohio2295. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________ 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.