Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-1865.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. GOLDEN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-1865.] (No. 2012-0764—June 1, 2022—Decided June 3, 2022.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Kenneth Louis Golden, Attorney Registration No. 0078441, last known address in West Hollywood, California. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 12, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(11), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with twenty-one months stayed and ordered that he would not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until he was reinstated to the practice of law in the state of California, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden, 132 Ohio St.3d 1236, 2012-Ohio-3149, 972 N.E.2d 599. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
