Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3443.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2015-OHIO-3443 ROSS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3443.] Taxation—Real-property valuation—Board of Tax Appeals’ decision vacated and cause remanded for consideration in light of Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision. (No. 2013-1951—Submitted January 13, 2015—Decided August 27, 2015.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2013-607. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3431, which addressed a property located in close proximity to the property at issue here and which held SUPREME COURT OF OHIO that a recent, arm’s-length sale price of $5,000 was the value of the property. On remand, the BTA shall consider the $5,000 value of the Schwartz property along with all the other evidence currently in the record to determine the value of the property at issue. Decision vacated, and cause remanded. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. _________________ J. Alex Morton, for appellants. Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Reno J. Oradini Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees. _________________ 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.