Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuh
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-2172.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LEHMKUHL. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-2172.] (No. 2012-1719 Submitted May 20, 2014, 2014 Decided May 23, 2014.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Phillip Douglas Lehmkuhl, Attorney Registration No. 0021246, last known business address in Mt. Vernon, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 27, 2014, wherein the court suspended respondent from the practice of law until respondent paid all costs and accrued interest in full, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. O CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O NEILL, JJ., concur. ________________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
