In re Continuing Legal Edn. Suspension of DiAlbert
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as In re Continuing Legal Edn. Suspension of DiAlbert, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio2396.] IN RE CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION SUSPENSION OF DIALBERT. [Cite as In re Continuing Legal Edn. Suspension of DiAlbert, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-2396.] (No. CLE-2006-30101 Submitted June 3, 2014 Decided June 6, 2014.) ON REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION ____________________ {¶ 1} This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 2004-2005 reporting period. {¶ 2} On May 24, 2007, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon respondent, and suspended respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3) and (5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7); respondent complies with the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio; respondent complies with this and all other orders of the court; and this court orders respondent reinstated. {¶ 3} On May 14, 2014, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies, and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. The commission certified that respondent had completed the credit hours of continuing legal education required SUPREME COURT OF OHIO during the suspension by this court s order of suspension. Respondent has satisfied all the requirements of this court s order of suspension. {¶ 4} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopted and respondent, John Eugene DiAlbert, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law. O CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O NEILL, JJ., concur. ________________________ 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
