In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Williams

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Williams, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5348.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2011-OHIO-5348 IN RE CASES HELD FOR THE DECISION IN STATE v. WILLIAMS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Williams, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5348.] Disposition of cases held for the decision in State v. Williams Judgments of the courts of appeals reversed and causes remanded for application of Williams or causes dismissed as improvidently accepted. (Submitted August 8, 2011 Decided October 20, 2011.) __________________ {¶ 1} The following cases were held for the decision in State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374, ___ N.E.2d ___. The judgments of the courts of appeals are reversed and the causes are remanded for application of Williams. {¶ 2} 2009-0045. State v. Swank, Lake App. No. 2008-L-019, 2008-Ohio6059. {¶ 3} 2009-0150. State v. Countryman, Washington App. No. 08CA12, 2008-Ohio-6700. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 4} 2009-0454. State v. Fisher, Summit App. No. 24116, 2009-Ohio332. {¶ 5} 2009-0560. State v. Rabel, Cuyahoga App. No. 91280, 2009-Ohio350. {¶ 6} 2009-0645. Holcomb v. State, Logan App. Nos. 8-08-23, 8-08-24, 8-08-25, and 8-08-26, 2009-Ohio-782. {¶ 7} 2009-0777. State v. Gilfillan, Franklin App. No. 08AP-317, 2009Ohio-1104. {¶ 8} 2009-0840. State v. Hartman, Cuyahoga App. No. 91040, 2009Ohio-1069. {¶ 9} 2009-0863. State v. Omiencinski, Cuyahoga App. No. 90510, 2009Ohio-1066. {¶ 10} 2009-1024. State v. Blanchard, Cuyahoga App. No. 90935, 2009Ohio-1357. {¶ 11} 2009-1049. State v. Toney, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 91582, 91583, 91584, 91585, 91588, 91589, 91590, 91591, 91592, 91593, 91594, 91595, 91596, 91870, 91871, and 91872, 2009-Ohio-1881. {¶ 12} 2009-1227. State v. Franklin, Franklin App. No. 08AP-900, 2009Ohio-2664. {¶ 13} 2009-1419. State v. Irvin, Ross App. No. 08CA3057, 2009-Ohio3128. {¶ 14} 2009-1493. State v. Gresham, Montgomery App. No. 22766, 2009-Ohio-3305. {¶ 15} 2009-1588. State v. Marks, Ashtabula App. No. 2008-A-0048, 2009-Ohio-3790. {¶ 16} 2009-1604. State v. Day, Adams App. Nos. 08CA865 and 08CA866, 2009-Ohio-3755. 2 January Term, 2011 {¶ 17} 2009-1716. State v. Irvin, Ross App. No. 08CA3056, 2009-Ohio4181. {¶ 18} 2009-1811. State v. McGuire, Richland App. No. 08 CA 227, 2009-Ohio-4397. {¶ 19} 2009-1844. State v. Howard, Ross App. No. 08CA 3086, 2009Ohio-4496. {¶ 20} 2009-2200. State v. Kenney, Franklin App. No. 09AP-231, 2009Ohio-5584. {¶ 21} 2010-0289. Caes v. State, Warren App. No. CA2009-07-095, 2009-Ohio-6920. {¶ 22} 2010-0329. State v. Taylor, Athens App. No. 09CA22, 2010-Ohio141. {¶ 23} 2010-0627. State v. Boehnke, Warren App. No. CA2009-06-070, 2010-Ohio-737. {¶ 24} 2010-1882. Green v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090650, 2010Ohio-4371. {¶ 25} 2010-1911. Young v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090771. {¶ 26} 2010-1914. Feltha v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090796. {¶ 27} 2010-1915. Beck v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090891. {¶ 28} 2010-1917. Phifer v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-090861. {¶ 29} 2010-1942. Sparks v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-100063. {¶ 30} 2010-2157. Mitchell v. State, Hamilton App. No. C-100061. {¶ 31} 2011-0226. State v. Wade, Franklin App. No. 10AP-159, 2010Ohio-6395. O CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. O DONNELL, J., dissents and would affirm the judgments of the courts of appeals. 3 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO __________________ {¶ 32} The following case was held for the decision in State v. Williams, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2011-Ohio-3374, ___ N.E.2d ___. It is hereby dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. {¶ 33} 2009-1858. State v. Menton, Mahoning App. No. 07 MA 70, 2009Ohio-4640. O CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. O DONNELL, J., dissents. __________________ {¶ 34} The following cases were held for the decision in State v. Williams, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2011-Ohio-3374, ___ N.E.2d ___. They are hereby dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. {¶ 35} 2011-0312. State v. Hartley, Licking App. No. 10 CA 65, 2011Ohio-96. {¶ 36} 2011-0442. Clager v. State, Licking App. No. 10 CA 49, 2010Ohio-6074. {¶ 37} 2011-0586. Core v. State, Franklin App. No. 09AP-192, 191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292. O CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. O DONNELL and CUPP, JJ., dissent. ______________________ 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.