Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Ohio Consumers Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm., 121 Ohio St.3d 372, 2009-Ohio-605.] OHIO CONSUMERS COUNSEL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL, APPELLEES. [Cite as Ohio Consumers Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm., 121 Ohio St.3d 372, 2009-Ohio-605.] Cause dismissed as moot. (No. 2008-0466 Submitted November 18, 2008 Decided February 19, 2009.) APPEAL from Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Nos. 05-724-EL-UNC, 05-725-EL-UNC, 06-1068-EL-UNC, 06-1069-EL-UNC, and 06-1085-EL-UNC. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as moot for the reasons stated in our opinion in Ohio Consumers Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm., 121 Ohio St.3d 362, 2009-Ohio-604, ___ N.E.2d ___, at ¶ 2. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Janine L. Migden-Ostrander, Consumers Counsel, and Jeffrey L. Small and Ann M. Hotz, Assistant Consumers Counsel, for appellant Ohio Consumers Counsel. Colleen L. Mooney and David C. Rinebolt, for appellant Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Stephen A. Reilly and Werner L. Margard III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Paul A. Colbert, Rocco D Ascenzo, and Elizabeth A. McNellie, for intervening appellee Duke Energy of Ohio, Inc. ______________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.