State v. Bankhead

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State v. Bankhead, 123 Ohio St.3d 143, 2009-Ohio-4303.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BANKHEAD, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Bankhead, 123 Ohio St.3d 143, 2009-Ohio-4303.] Court of appeals judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Bloomer, and appellant discharged from postrelease control. (No. 2007-0818 Submitted July 14, 2009 Decided September 1, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-060480, 2007-Ohio-1314. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bloomer, 122 Ohio St.3d 200, 2009-Ohio-2462, 909 N.E.2d 1254. Appellant is discharged from postrelease control because he has completed serving his prison sentence and, pursuant to State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, is no longer subject to resentencing. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. ______________________ Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Michaela M. Stagnaro, for appellant. ______________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.