Kirchner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Kirchner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 348, 2009-Ohio-3714.] KIRCHNER, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. SHOOTERS ON THE WATER, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Kirchner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 348, 2009-Ohio-3714.] Court of appeals judgment affirmed on the authority of Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc. (No. 2006-1682 Submitted June 16, 2009 Decided August 4, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 86919, 167 Ohio App.3d 708, 2006-Ohio-3583. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 120, 2009-Ohio-2495, 909 N.E.2d 120. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc. __________________ Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers; and Law Offices of Frank Gallucci and Leon M. Plevin, for appellant. Valore & Cruse Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey M. Elzeer, and Kathryn A. Kerka; and Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., and Mark J. Valponi, for appellees Shooters on the Water, Inc., and Roger Loecy. Davis & Young and George W. Lutjen, for appellees Michael Miller, Judith Miller, and Gabrielle Miller. Dennis R. Spirgen, for appellee Sugar Warehouse Limited Partnership. ______________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.