Bogan v. Hall

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Bogan v. Hall, 121 Ohio St.3d 608, 2009-Ohio-1930.] BOGAN, APPELLANT, v. HALL, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Bogan v. Hall, 121 Ohio St.3d 608, 2009-Ohio-1930.] Habeas corpus Failure to attach copies of commitment papers to petition Dismissal of petition affirmed. (No. 2008-2331 Submitted April 21, 2009 Decided April 30, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 08-CA-94, 2008-Ohio-5708. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the petition of appellant, James C. Bogan, for a writ of habeas corpus. Bogan failed to attach copies of his commitment papers to his petition. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692,¶ 14; R.C. 2725.04(D). Judgment affirmed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ James C. Bogan, pro se. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Samuel Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. ______________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.