Morrin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Morrin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 121 Ohio St.3d 359, 2009-Ohio-1499.] MORRIN, APPELLEE, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, APPELLANT, ET AL; ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF WORKERS COMPENSATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Morrin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 121 Ohio St.3d 359, 2009-Ohio-1499.] Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed. (No. 2008-0277 Submitted March 25, 2009 Decided April 7, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-07-1173, 2007-Ohio-6888. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Thorton v. Montville Plastics & Rubber, Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 124, 2009-Ohio360, 902 N.E.2d 482. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, O CONNOR, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O DONNELL, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Thorton v. Montville Plastics & Rubber, Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 124, 2009-Ohio-390, 902 N.E.2d 482. __________________ Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas J. Gibney, and Sarah E. Pawlicki, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, Elise Porter, Assistant Solicitor, and Joshua W. Lanzinger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Administrator, Bureau of Workers Compensation. ______________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.