Disciplinary Counsel v. Kreiling

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kreiling, 105 Ohio St.3d. 1201, 2005-Ohio-389.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KREILING. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kreiling, 105 Ohio St.3d 1201, 2005-Ohio-389.] Attorneys at law Reciprocal discipline from the Supreme Court of Florida Permanent disbarment Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4). (No. 2004-1825 Submitted January 13, 2005 Decided January 20, 2005.) ON CERTIFIED ORDER of the Supreme Court of Florida, No. SC03-1225. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F). {¶ 2} On October 29, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this court a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Florida entered December 11, 2003, in The Florida Bar v. Edward Paul Kreiling, in Case No. SC03-1225, 864 So.2d 401, permanently disbarring respondent. On November 16, 2004, this court ordered respondent to show cause why identical or comparable discipline should not be imposed in this state. Respondent filed no response to the show cause order. This cause was considered by the court and on consideration thereof, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), respondent, Edward Paul Kreiling, Attorney Registration No. 0007743, last known business address in Weston, Florida, be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent immediately cease and desist from the practice of law in any form and is hereby forbidden to appear on behalf of another before any court, judge, commission, board, administrative agency or other public authority. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 5} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby forbidden to counsel or advise or prepare legal instruments for others or in any manner perform such services. {¶ 6} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby divested of each, any and all of the rights, privileges and prerogatives customarily accorded to a member in good standing of the legal profession of Ohio. {¶ 7} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent surrender respondent's certificate of admission to practice to the Clerk of the court on or before 30 days from the date of this order, and that respondent's name be stricken from the roll of attorneys maintained by this court. {¶ 8} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court that within 90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against the respondent by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of this order, the Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients' Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award. {¶ 9} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 30 days from the date of this order, respondent shall: {¶ 10} 1. Notify all clients being represented in pending matters and any co-counsel of respondent's permanent disbarment and consequent disqualification to act as an attorney after the effective date of this order and, in the absence of co-counsel, also notify the clients to seek legal service elsewhere, calling attention to any urgency in seeking the substitution of another attorney in his place; {¶ 11} 2. Regardless of any fees or expenses due respondent, deliver to all clients being represented in pending matters any papers or other property 2 January Term, 2005 pertaining to the client, or notify the clients or co-counsel, if any, of a suitable time and place where the papers or other property may be obtained, calling attention to any urgency for obtaining such papers or other property; {¶ 12} 3. Refund any part of any fees or expenses paid in advance that are unearned or not paid, and account for any trust money or property in the possession or control of respondent; {¶ 13} 4. Notify opposing counsel in pending litigation or, in the absence of counsel, the adverse parties, of respondent's disqualification to act as an attorney after the effective date of this order, and file a notice of disqualification of respondent with the court or agency before which the litigation is pending for inclusion in the respective file or files; {¶ 14} 5. Send all notices required by this order by certified mail with a return address where communications may thereafter be directed to respondent; {¶ 15} 6. File with the Clerk of this court and the Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court an affidavit showing compliance with this order, showing proof of service of notices required herein, and setting forth the address where the affiant may receive communications; and {¶ 16} 7. Retain and maintain a record of the various steps taken by respondent pursuant to this order. {¶ 17} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that until such time as respondent fully complies with this order, respondent shall keep the Clerk and the Disciplinary Counsel advised of any change of address where respondent may receive communications. {¶ 18} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings. 3 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO {¶ 19} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney Registration Section. {¶ 20} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. _____________________ 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.