State ex rel. Maynard v. Invensys Application Controls
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State ex rel. Maynard v. Invensys Application Controls, 105 Ohio St.3d 176, 2005Ohio-1147.] THE STATE EX REL. MAYNARD, APPELLANT, v. INVENSYS APPLICATION CONTROLS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Maynard v. Invensys Application Controls, 105 Ohio St.3d 176, 2005-Ohio-1147.] Workers' compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 2004-0924 Submitted February 15, 2005 Decided March 30, 2005.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 03AP-371, 2004-Ohio-2638. __________________ {ΒΆ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. __________________ Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant. Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Charles D. Smith, and Eric S. Bravo, for appellee Invensys Application Controls. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Paul H. Tonks, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. _____________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
