Costin v. Consol. Ceramic Products, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Costin v. Consol. Ceramic Products, Inc., 102 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2004-Ohio-1757.] COSTIN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CONSOLIDATED CERAMIC PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLANT. [Cite as Costin v. Consol. Ceramic Products, Inc., 102 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2004Ohio-1757.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2003-0569 Submitted March 16, 2004 Decided April 21, 2004.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 81611, 2003-Ohio437. __________________ {ΒΆ1} This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR and O DONNELL, JJ., concur. __________________ Lowe, Eklund, Wakefield & Mulvihill Co., L.P.A., and Mark L. Wakefield, for appellee Brian Costin. Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, L.L.P., and Shawn W. Maestle, for appellant. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
