Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi, 98 Ohio St.3d 1205, 2003-Ohio-502.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LOMBARDI. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi, 98 Ohio St.3d 1205, 2003-Ohio502.] (No. 2002-0325 Submitted January 17, 2003 Decided January 22, 2003.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Marcus M. Lombardi, Attorney Registration No. 0042349, last known business address in Akron, Ohio. {¶2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 3, 2002, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with 18 months stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Marcus M. Lombardi be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi, 96 Ohio St.3d 54, 2002-Ohio-2990, 770 N.E.2d 1013. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O CONNOR, JJ., concur. __________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.