Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 305, 2003-Ohio-3632.] KLAUSS, APPELLEE, v. MARC GLASSMAN, INC. ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 305, 2003-Ohio-3632.] Discretionary appeal allowed Court of appeals judgment reversed on authority of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc. (No. 2003-0386 Submitted June 3, 2003 Decided July 23, 2003.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 80741, 2003-Ohio157. __________________ {¶1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573, 788 N.E.2d 1088. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR and O DONNELL, JJ., concur. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________ Jeffries, Kube, Forrest & Monteleone Co., L.P.A., and Bradford D. Zelasko, for appellee. Schulman, Schulman & Meros, John C. Meros and Jack M. Schulman, for appellant. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
