State v. Wright
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Wright, 98 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2003-Ohio-1488.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WRIGHT, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Wright, 98 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2003-Ohio-1488.] Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified due to want of a conflict. (No. 2002-0234 Submitted February 25, 2003 Decided April 9, 2003.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Washington County, No. 00CA39, 2001Ohio-2473. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified; there is want of a conflict. RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COONEY, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O CONNOR, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent. COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for COOK, J. __________________ Michael G. Spahr, Washington County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Carol A. Wright, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Kirk A. Lindsey, Associate Solicitor, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Attorney General of Ohio. David L. Doughten and Paul Skendelas, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
