Toledo v. Ross
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Toledo v. Ross, 97 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2002-Ohio-5780.] CITY OF TOLEDO, APPELLANT, v. ROSS, APPELLEE. [Cite as Toledo v. Ross, 97 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2002-Ohio-5780.] Appeal dismissed as moot. (No. 2001-1815 Submitted September 18, 2002 Decided November 6, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, Nos. L-00-1337, L-001338, L-00-1339, L-00-1340, L-00-1341 and L-00-1342. __________________ {ΒΆ1} The appeal is dismissed as moot. MOYER, C.J., GRENDELL, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for RESNICK, J. __________________ Barbara E. Herring, Director of Law, John T. Madigan, General Counsel, and Lora L. Manon, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Shindler, Neff, Holmes & Schlageter, L.L.P., and Richard L. Emery; Wise & Dorner, Ltd., and Bernadette Restivo Noe, for appellee. Barry M. Byron, Stephen L. Byron and John Gotherman, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Municipal League. __________________ 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
