State ex rel. Routt v. Indus. Comm.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Routt v. Indus. Comm., 93 Ohio St.3d 498, 2001-Ohio-1599] THE STATE EX REL. ROUTT, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Routt v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 498.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 01-567 Submitted September 18, 2001 Decided October 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-579. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in the opinions of the appellate court s dissenting judge and the magistrate. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and Jonathan H. Goodman, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.