State v. Wozniak

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State v. Wozniak , 93 Ohio St.3d 173, 2001-Ohio-1307] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WOZNIAK, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Wozniak (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 173.] Criminal law Sexual predators R.C. 2950.09(B)(2) does not violate the separation of powers doctrine Court of appeals judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Thompson. (Nos. 00-2014 and 00-2157 Submitted January 9, 2001 Decided September 19, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-349. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Thompson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 584, 752 N.E.2d 276. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Ron O Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sarah W. Thompson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David L. Strait, Franklin County Public Defender, for appellant. __________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.