State ex rel. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as State ex rel. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 92 Ohio St.3d 537, 2001-Ohio-1277] THE STATE EX REL. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE; WILLIAMS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 537.] Workers compensation Court of appeals judgment affirmed. (No. 00-2113 Submitted June 20, 2001 Decided August 15, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1069. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Bobbie S. Sprader and Thomas R. Sant, for appellee Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Law Offices of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. __________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.